A Comparison of Parallel Implementations of Flux Corrected Transport Codes
Authors: Jong, Jing-ming, Stiles, G. S.
We present the results of comparing implementations of the Flux Corrected Transport (FCT) method on transputers and several other parallel and sequential machines. FCT is a finite difference scheme used to solve fluid dynamics problem which may involve steep gradients or shocks; it has proven useful for both one- and two-dimensional problems in plasma physics, atmospheric sciences, and detonation studies. The method vectorizes very well and hence runs quickly on supercomputers. Since the calculations at each point involve only a small number of neighbors, the method can also be efficiently implemented on multi-processor systems. We have run one- and two-dimensional problems on Transputers and several other systems, including a VAX 8650, a SUN 4/280, a four-processor Ardent Titan, an eight-processor Alliant FX/8, and a four-processor Silicon Graphics 240GTX. We shall also compare our results to those obtained by Gustafson (1988) on the NCube/ten.If, in the 1-d problem, we consider the speed of a single T800 to be 1.0, the SUN 4/280 ranks at 3.8, the VAX 8650 at 4.0, 8 TSOOs at 7.9, the Silicon Graphics 240GTX at 27.0, the FX/8 at 56.9, and the Titan at 64.4. On the 1-d problem, again taking one T800 to have a speed of 1.0, the SUN comes in at 3.6, 16 NCube nodes at 4.0, the 8650 at 4.3, 8 TSOOs at 7.7, the Titan at 65.3, and the FX/8 at 101.4. The transputer ranks highest if we calculate the cost-effectiveness of the various systems by dividing the relative speed by the approximate cost. If we assume the 8 TSOOs have a cost-effectiveness of 1.0 on the 1-d problem, the Titan is second at 0.52, followed by the 240GTX at 0.17, the FX/8 at 0.094, the SUN at 0.081, and the VAX at 0.021.
OUG-11: Developing Transputer Applications, J. Wexler, 1989, pp 113 - 128 published by IOS Press, Amsterdam
This record in other formats:Web page: BibTEX, Refer
Plain text: BibTEX, Refer
If you have any comments on this database, including inaccuracies, requests to remove or add information, or suggestions for improvement, the WoTUG web team are happy to hear of them. We will do our best to resolve problems to everyone's satisfaction.
Copyright for the papers presented in this database normally resides with the authors; please contact them directly for more information. Addresses are normally presented in the full paper.
Pages © WoTUG, or the indicated author. All Rights Reserved.
Comments on these web pages should be addressed to: www at wotug.org