db_connect: Could not connect to paper db at "wotug@dragon.kent.ac.uk"<br>
db_connect: Could not connect to paper db at "wotug@dragon.kent.ac.uk"<br>
@InProceedings{FriborgVinter11,
  title =        "{V}erification of a {D}ynamic {C}hannel {M}odel using the {SPIN} {M}odel-{C}hecker",
db_connect: Could not connect to paper db at "wotug@dragon.kent.ac.uk"<br>
  author=        "Friborg,  Rune Møllegard and Vinter,  Brian",
db_connect: Could not connect to paper db at "wotug@dragon.kent.ac.uk"<br>
  editor=        "Welch, Peter H. and Sampson,  Adam T. and Pedersen,  Jan Bækgaard and Kerridge,  Jon and Broenink,  Jan F. and Barnes,  Frederick R. M.",
db_connect: Could not connect to paper db at "wotug@dragon.kent.ac.uk"<br>
  pages =        "35--54",
  booktitle=     "{C}ommunicating {P}rocess {A}rchitectures 2011",
  isbn=          "978-1-60750-773-4",
  year=          "2011",
  month=         "jun",
  abstract=      "This paper presents the central elements of a new dynamic
     channel
leading towards a flexible CSP design suited for
     high-level languages.
This channel is separated into three
     models: a shared-memory channel, a
distributed channel and a
     dynamic synchronisation layer.  The models are
described
     such that they may function as a basis for implementing a
     CSP
library, though many of the common features known in
     available CSP
libraries have been excluded from the models.
     The SPIN model checker has
been used to check for the
     presence of deadlocks, livelocks, starvation,
race
     conditions and correct channel communication behaviour. The
     three
models are separately verified for a variety of
     different process
configurations. This verification is
     performed automatically by doing an
exhaustive verification
     of all possible transitions using SPIN. The
joint result of
     the models is a single dynamic channel type which
supports
     both local and distributed any-to-any communication. This
     model
has not been verified and the large state-space may
     make it unsuited for
exhaustive verification using a model
     checker. An implementation of the
dynamic channel will be
     able to change the internal synchronisation
mechanisms
     on-the-fly, depending on the number of channel-ends
     connected
or their location."
}