From: Conor O'Neill <Conor@puddle.demon.co.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.transputer
Subject: Re: Toolset D7314A YEAR 2000 Compliance
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 20:42:57 +0000
Organization: Home
Message-Id: <CrTYPPARZD52Ew69@puddle.demon.co.uk>
References: <01be696e$6d7a4040$92c809c0@chessa>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Xref: ukc comp.sys.transputer:9079


In article <01be696e$6d7a4040$92c809c0@chessa>, Alberto Chessa
<achessa@fiar.finmeccanica.it> writes
>Is "Inmos D7314A Toolset" Year 2000 Compliant ? 
>
>Thanks

Fraid I can't help you on that one, but I know that when I wrote the
date manipulation routines in the D7305A (?) occam toolset, I went to
great lengths to try to ensure I got the algorithms for things like leap
years correct.
-- 
Conor O'Neill, at home in Bristol, UK
"It's state of the art." "But it doesn't work". "That is the state of the art!"