From: Vincent Lefevre <Vincent.Lefevre@ens-lyon.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.arm,comp.sys.transputer
Subject: Re: Floating Point Performance of the StrongARM
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 1999 04:12:41 +0100
Organization: a training zoo
Message-Id: <48ce5fe1deVincent.Lefevre@pm-vlefevre.ens-lyon.fr>
References: <797adq$br7$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
Reply-To: vlefevre+news@ens-lyon.fr
User-Agent: Pluto/1.10g (RISC-OS/3.7)
Xref: ukc comp.sys.arm:3047 comp.sys.transputer:9021


In article <797adq$br7$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>,
   <Brian.Oneill@ntu.ac.uk> wrote:

>                             Integer                Float
> StrongARM
>    2.11 compiler           0.366 sec             34.50 sec
>    2.50 compiler           0.366 sec              1.29 sec
>    J Browm<s FP                                  10.30 sec

> Transputer (25MHz)         5.35 sec               5.49 sec
> Pentium (200MHz)           0.30 sec               0.50 sec

Your Pentium seems to be very slow. Here's what I get for the Float
version:

Sun SparcStation-5 (70MHz)                          0.53  sec
Sun Ultra-5 (333MHz)                                0.045 sec
Intel PentiumPro (150MHz)                           0.095 sec

-- 
Vincent Lefevre <Vincent.Lefevre@ens-lyon.fr> - PhD stud. in Computer Science
Web: http://www.ens-lyon.fr/~vlefevre/ - 100% validated HTML - Acorn Risc PC,
Yellow Pig 17, Championnat International des Jeux Mathematiques et Logiques,
TETRHEX, Faits divers insolites, etc...