From: Stephen Maudsley <Stephen.Maudsley@esgem.com>
Newsgroups: comp.editors,comp.sys.transputer
Subject: Re: Folding editors
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 13:28:29 +0000
Organization: esgem limited
Message-Id: <3639BEFD.2CC25E3C@esgem.com>
References: <36374B57.168B9492@pact.srf.ac.uk>
    <71aj0c$oc$1@fangorn.moria.de> <6r1znq7264.fsf@belhaven.spider.com>
Reply-To: Stephen.Maudsley@esgem.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Xref: ukc comp.editors:31993 comp.sys.transputer:8887


Iain A F Fleming wrote:

> The entity calling itself Michael Haardt wrote:
> >
> >  If you are out for X11 support, then check GNU Emacs with outline
> >  mode (http://www.csd.uu.se/~andersl/emacs.shtml).
>
> There is also a reasonably worked folding mode for GNU Emacs - foldingo,
> by Christian Queinnec, of INRIA. It can probably be found at all good ftp
> sites, but if not, I'll email a copy to anyone who wants to see it.
>
> It what I used to cope with folded files when I was working at inmos/ST.
> I do, however, hold to the view that folding is evil, and leads to the
> creation of poorly structured, monolithic, programs.

Why do you consider that to be the case?

Certainly I've seen code where scoping of variables has been so convoluted
that it was unmaintainable.

--
Stephen Maudsley  mailto:Stephen.Maudsley@esgem.com
Esgem Limited for electronic product design
http://www.esgem.com
Tel: +44-1453-521626 Mobile: +44-370-810991

