Newsgroups: comp.sys.transputer
From: kjobesb@cix.co.uk (k jobes)
Subject: Re: All Transputers and support products discontinued
Organization: CIX - Compulink Information eXchange
Date: 19 Apr 1998 07:06:57 GMT
Message-ID: <memo.19980419080805.9831B@kjobesb.compulink.co.uk>

In article <E7LrwJAApIM1Ewvg@cawley.demon.co.uk>, alec@cawley.demon.co.uk
(Alec Cawley) wrote:

> In article <6gpm7q$g7l$1@mendelevium.btinternet.com>, Stephen Maudsley
> <Stephen.Maudsley@esgem.com> writes
>
> >I have seen an account that stated that Intel had bought ARM licences
> in
> >order to manufacture the ARM (I don't know if that's for StrongARM or
> >not). It might be attractive to Intel for portable low-power systems.
>
> As I understand it, Intel have agreed licensing terms with Arm to
> continue production of the StrongArm and those derivatives already in
> the pipeline, and have stated their intention to "support the product".
> However, the FTC has not yet okayed the whole Alpha/StrongArm sale, so
> that they are not going to get very bullish about it until it is
> certainly clear.
>
> So far as long term prospects go, this depends on internal turf-wars
> inside Intel, whose outcome depends more on personalities than
> technicalities. The Pentium side of the company (which is, obviously,
> huge) is trying to produce some lower power consumption, lower powered,
> pentium chips, which (unlike the standard chips) they will guarantee to
> have a production lifetime of more than 12 months. However, when put
> alongside the StrongArm, and assuming that your application doesn't need
> floating point (as mine don't), the comparison is laughable. However,
> those who regard every application as starting from Windows (or even
> DOS) point out that the SA doesn't rune either of those (thankfully,
> IMO). There are presumably others inside Intel who realise that some
> people do not work in the desktop environment and have different needs,
> who have produced the statements we have already heard. From their pont
> of view (I assume, because it is my point of view), SA gives them a
> product ot cover a hole in the market which the pentium will *never*
> fill. Alright, it may be a few percent of the Pentium market, but its
> multi-million dollar market. Which of these two camps wins is not
> predictable to outsiders.
>
> --
> Alec Cawley
> Newbury
> Berks, UK
>
Am I wrong, but are intel developing a Message Passing chip similar in
concept to the transputer? This may just be a loose rumour I heard, but
there might be something in it

Keith jobes

