Newsgroups: comp.sys.transputer
From: Alec Cawley <alec@cawley.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Transputer-> Forgotten Futures
Organization: Home
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 00:11:00 +0000
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <CKl6cGAUs530EwBx@cawley.demon.co.uk>

In article <o41zxc1hgf.fsf@ember.dstc.edu.au>, David Arnold
<arnold@ember.dstc.edu.au> writes
>pete <pete@feeney.co.uk> writes:
>> Alec Cawley wrote:
>> 
>> > Pin compatability would be nice, and speed acceptance, but is not
>> > essential.
>
>
>how useful would TRAM compatibility be?  it would be easier to get the
>new package(s) onto a TRAM ...

No use to me, because we have to take the bus to the perpherals we are
controlling, but others may be interested. I can see that Tram
compatability would be much easier to acheive.

-- 
Alec Cawley
Newbury
Berks, UK