HCW 95:
4th Heterogeneous Computing Workshop
Referee Report Form

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Instructions

    Please email this evaluation to "vss@mathcs.emory.edu" by
    December 21, 1994.  New copies of this form may be obtained
    by anonymous FTP to mathcs.emory.edu in pub/vss/refform.

    If you prefer, you may return your review in hardcopy form to
	Vaidy Sunderam
	Math & CS, Emory Univ.
	Atlanta, GA 30322
    or fax it to me at (404) 727-5611

    Either way, your assistance is greatly appreciated!

------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Paper / The Reviewer

    Paper No:

    Title: 

    Authors: 


    Program Committee Member:

    Actual referee (if different):

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Evaluation

    Put an X in the appropriate box for each catagory.

                               Low             Average            High
                               -3    -2    -1     0     1     2     3
                             +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
    Relevance to conference: |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |
                             +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
    Originality:             |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |
                             +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
    Technical contribution:  |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |
                             +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
    Presentation:            |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |
                             +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+


                                      Weak    Weak            Strong
                              Reject  Reject  Accept  Accept  Accept
                              -2      -1      0       1       2
                             +-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
    Overall evaluation:      |       |       |       |       |       |
                             +-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+

                              Low     Medium  High
                              1       2       3
    Confidence of reviewer   +-------+-------+-------+
    in paper's subject area: |       |       |       |
                             +-------+-------+-------+

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments to the authors: (as many lines as you need, but please jot down
	at least a sentence or two as your valuable feedback to the authors)


------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONFIDENTIAL comments to program committee: (as many lines as you need)


------------------------------------------------------------------------