From: Ruth Ivimey-Cook (ruth_at_email.domain.hidden)
Date: 2001-08-29 22:25:23
On Wednesday 29 Aug 2001 12:08 am, you wrote:
> Actually I didn't use assembly at all in channel.c,
> but channel.c was so small that it would not be much
> trouble to put it into assembly for any chip desired.
> The template would be the same.
Could you let me look? Perhaps I wasn't clear, but I don't want assembly in
the source -- having it makes the system unportable -- so a pure-c source is
great!
> Macros, as well as function calls, can be used to
> manipulate workspaces: I haven't used them, but am
> doing the equivalent by hand.
ATM I don't know if I'm going to use workspaces in the traditional transputer
way. It seems to me that the scheduler / IO library gets to determine things
like that.
> As soon as you've got it working the fun begins when
> you get your occam program talking to another occam
> program running simultaneously on the same computer,
> or via hardware on another computer, all without
> bothering the OS.
YEAH!
Regards,
Ruth
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 on 2004-10-31 20:04:00 GMT
© Copyright WoTUG
All rights reserved