From: M_Boosten (mboosten_at_email.domain.hidden)
Date: 2001-07-26 14:52:19
Peter and others,
Peter wrote:
> If we had "experimental", I'd not hesitate to include it!
Incremental Refinement is fundamental in succesful R&D.
Establish the cycle: (theory ; practice ; interaction)*
or in our situation (csp; jcsp; cpa)* :-)
By not having "experimental", you break the cycle. You
place formality above contents. This is fundamentally
wrong.
Peter:
> It's just the difficulty of making the "is-it-
> really-necessary" judgement ... we keep getting it wrong!!
Indeed.
Solution: introduce "experimental" status right now.
Peter wrote:
> Peter.
What about: "> peter" :-)
marcel
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 on 2004-10-31 20:03:58 GMT
© Copyright WoTUG
All rights reserved