Re: (now completed) Slides from my talk at CPA2000

From: A E Lawrence (adrian.lawrence_at_email.domain.hidden)
Date: 2000-12-01 21:55:00

• Next message: Tom Locke: "(now completed) Slides from my talk at CPA2000"
• Previous message: Richard Beton: "Re: CommsTime times?"
• Maybe in reply to: Tom Locke: "(now completed) Slides from my talk at CPA2000"
• Next in thread: Tom Locke: "RE: (now completed) Slides from my talk at CPA2000"

Tom Locke wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> On Wednesday, here at Kent, I gave a much more complete talk about the
> problems I have with OO, and my proposed CSP-based 'better component
> oriented language'.
>
> The talk was titled (partly for marketing purposes!)
>
> "The Broken Promises of OO"
>
> The slides are available from my home page:
>
> http://www.cs.ukc.ac.uk/people/rpg/tsl2/
>
> Direct link:
>
> http://www.cs.ukc.ac.uk/people/rpg/tsl2/broken-promises.pdf
>
> I look forward to your comments!

As you will have seen, I have already pointed one mailing list who were
debating about moving towards an object orientated design philosophy to
your slides. Thay seem to be a well balanced sensible group, but then
they come from the hardware community who understand parallelism already
as opposed to the typical sequentially compromised software person :-)
Ducks... So you shouldn't get any flames.

Adrian

-- 
Dr A E Lawrence

• Next message: Tom Locke: "(now completed) Slides from my talk at CPA2000"
• Previous message: Richard Beton: "Re: CommsTime times?"
• Maybe in reply to: Tom Locke: "(now completed) Slides from my talk at CPA2000"
• Next in thread: Tom Locke: "RE: (now completed) Slides from my talk at CPA2000"

Original text of this message